Safi.
AI-powered peace agreement analysis.
The first platform that evaluates peace resolution drafts in real time, calculating the likelihood of success against historical precedent — so negotiators can strengthen agreements before they are signed.
Peace negotiations are costly, slow, and structurally prone to failure.
No data-driven drafting
Resolutions are built on political intuition alone. Negotiators have no systematic view of what language has historically produced durable agreements — and what has failed.
Time is critical, and wasted
Every day of unproductive negotiation carries humanitarian and economic consequences. Mediators lack rapid, objective tools to distinguish high-potential language from low-yield provisions.
Invisible language patterns
Vague provisions, unenforceable clauses, and buzzword-heavy drafting quietly undermine agreement durability — often unrecognized until implementation collapses years later.
Evaluate drafts against 2,000+ agreements in minutes.
Safi is an AI-powered platform that analyzes peace resolution drafts in real time, drawing on historical trend data from thousands of international agreements. It flags problematic language and delivers ranked, actionable recommendations — all within minutes of submission.
Built for diplomats and mediators. Designed for speed and clarity.
Success likelihood score
A clear percentage score with confidence range — an objective benchmark to guide drafting and prioritize revision.
Language & clause detection
Flags ambiguous provisions, unenforceable obligations, and buzzwords correlated with agreement failure in historical data.
Ranked recommendations
Specific, ranked edits to strengthen provisions and improve the durability of the draft.
Multilingual support
Analysis available in all six UN official languages: English, French, Spanish, Arabic, Russian, and Chinese.
Real-time analysis
Submit a draft and receive a complete analysis within minutes — built for the pace of active negotiations.
Accessible design
No technical or legal expertise required. Built for diplomats, mediators, legal counsel, and policy staff from day one.
From draft submission to actionable insight.
Submit draft
Upload or paste a resolution draft via web or API.
AI analysis
Algorithm cross-references 2,000+ historical agreements in real time.
Flag issues
Problematic language, buzzwords, and unenforceable provisions are identified.
Success score
Safi calculates the % likelihood of agreement durability with a confidence range.
Recommendations
Ranked, specific edits to strengthen provisions and improve durability.
How Safi would have read the Oslo Accords and Israel-Palestine agreements.
Safi would have flagged 23 recurring language patterns across these five agreements — deferred sovereignty clauses, non-binding review mechanisms, and "good faith" obligations without enforcement teeth — all correlating with reduced durability in the historical data.
| Agreement | Year | Outcome | Safi score | Key flags detected |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oslo I | 1993 | Partial | 64% | Ambiguous 'final status' deferral; weak enforcement mechanisms |
| Oslo II | 1995 | Partial | 58% | Phased withdrawal vagueness; no independent compliance body |
| Wye River | 1998 | Limited | 51% | 'Good faith' obligations unenforceable; no arbitration clause |
| Camp David | 2000 | Failed | 31% | Core sovereignty disputes unresolved; no fallback provisions |
| Roadmap | 2003 | Stalled | 44% | Sequential obligations without triggering mechanism; vague milestones |
The cost of inaction is measured in trillions.
Against the $14.4 trillion annual global cost of violence and conflict (IEP 2024 Global Peace Index), even marginal improvements in peace agreement durability translate to extraordinary economic — and human — returns.
Safi is not merely an innovation investment — it is a uniquely cost-efficient lever for reducing human suffering at scale.
A structured pilot with the United Nations.
We are seeking a partnership with UN mediation and political affairs teams to deploy Safi within active processes — measuring impact rigorously and iterating on real diplomatic terrain.
Pilot program
Test Safi on 3–5 active UN mediation processes under controlled conditions.
Funding structure
Explore grant funding, licensing arrangements, and institutional partnership models.
System integration
Connect with UN DPA document management and mediation workflow frameworks.
Impact evaluation
Measure agreement quality against a control group over a structured 12-month pilot period.
Invest in the future of peace mediation.
Safi is ready for a pilot and scaling to support negotiators worldwide. We are inviting mission-aligned investors, foundations, and institutions to fund the next phase of development, validation, and deployment.
Capital and counsel in ventures aligned with how we think.
Beyond Safi, we make selective investments in early-stage companies and operating partnerships where our judgment can be as valuable as our capital. We look for founders solving real problems in regulated, complex, or relationship-heavy environments.
Governance technology
Tools that help boards, executive teams, and institutions make better documented decisions.
Mediation infrastructure
Platforms and services that improve access to neutral facilitation and principled negotiation.
Strategic decision systems
Companies whose products change the geometry of information in complex, high-stakes negotiations.
Where complex problems meet clear solutions.
Interested in a pilot, partnership, or investment conversation? We would welcome the opportunity to explore how Safi can support your work.